Few topics in Pakistan today generate as much confusion, controversy, and genuine misunderstanding as gender dysphoria and transgender identity. Part of the confusion comes from language — "gender dysphoria," "transgender," "khwaja sira," and "third gender" often get used interchangeably in everyday conversation, even though they mean different things clinically, legally, and culturally. This piece tries to separate the terms, explain what the research actually says, walk through the social and legal realities in Pakistan, and lay out the debate — including its genuinely contested and critical dimensions — as honestly as possible.
First, What Is Gender Dysphoria, Clinically?
Gender dysphoria is a recognized clinical diagnosis in the DSM-5-TR, the diagnostic manual used by psychiatrists worldwide. It refers to the distress a person experiences when there's a marked incongruence between the gender they experience internally and the sex they were assigned at birth. Importantly, the American Psychiatric Association is explicit on one point: gender nonconformity by itself is not a mental disorder. The diagnosis applies specifically to the clinically significant distress or impairment that some — not all — transgender or gender-diverse people experience.
This is a meaningful clinical distinction. Someone can identify as transgender without experiencing dysphoria, and dysphoria itself is defined by the presence of genuine psychological distress, not simply by identity or self-expression.
What Causes It? The Honest Answer: We Don't Fully Know
This is where a lot of online discourse oversimplifies. Despite decades of research, there is no single, agreed-upon cause of gender dysphoria. Medical literature generally describes it as arising from a complex interplay of biological, psychological, and social factors, rather than any one isolated cause.
On the biological side, some researchers have pointed to sex-linked differences in certain brain structures and to hormonal factors, including possible roles for androgen receptors — but the research base here is still described by medical reviewers as needing far more rigorous, well-designed study before firm conclusions can be drawn. On the psychological and developmental side, there's ongoing academic debate about early childhood experiences and identity formation. On the social side, some researchers argue that dysphoria-related distress is worsened — or in some framings, partly produced — by social stigma and rejection rather than being an intrinsic pathology at all.
In short: this remains a genuinely unsettled area of science, and anyone presenting it as fully "explained" — in either a purely biological or purely social direction — is oversimplifying an area active researchers still openly disagree on.
Gender Dysphoria Is Not the Same as Being Khwaja Sira
This is a crucial distinction in the Pakistani context specifically. Pakistan has a centuries-old, historically recognized community — khwaja sira, sometimes called hijra — with roots tracing back through the Mughal era and colonial period. Traditionally, this community has included people who are intersex, those assigned male at birth who adopt a feminine gender expression, and others who don't fit neatly into a male/female binary. Khwaja sira historically formed their own kinship networks, known as guru-chela systems, and occupied recognized (if marginal) social roles, including at courts and religious ceremonies.
The term "transgender" in its current global clinical sense is a comparatively recent import into Pakistani discourse, gaining traction mainly after 2010. This has created real friction: some khwaja sira community members and religious scholars argue that the modern, Western clinical framework of "transgender identity" and "self-perceived gender" doesn't map cleanly onto their own historical and cultural understanding of their community — a tension that has become central to the legal battle described below.
The Legal Landscape: Progress, Then Rollback
In May 2018, Pakistan's Parliament passed the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act — a genuinely landmark law at the time. It allowed transgender individuals to self-identify their gender on official documents like national identity cards and passports, and it prohibited discrimination in employment, healthcare, education, and public services.
The law was contested almost immediately. Religious political parties, including Jamaat-e-Islami and Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (F), argued the law's self-identification provisions could be misused — for instance, to permit inheritance fraud or to blur categories they consider religiously and legally distinct. Critics also raised concerns, later echoed by some feminist legal scholars, that a loosely defined "self-perceived" standard, without medical criteria, was vulnerable to misapplication.
On 19 May 2023, Pakistan's Federal Shariat Court — a court with constitutional authority to rule on whether laws conform to Islamic injunctions — struck down the law's core self-identification provisions. The court held that a person's gender must conform to their biological sex, ruling that self-perceived gender identity, absent an intersex medical condition, is not recognized under its interpretation of Islamic law. The court did affirm a distinct "third gender" category for intersex individuals. Transgender rights organizations immediately announced plans to appeal to the Supreme Court, where the case has remained under review.
The consequences of the ruling have been serious and material: loss of legal gender recognition, complications with inheritance rights, and reported difficulties even around burial rites for khwaja sira and transgender individuals who die — issues that human rights and medical organizations, including a commentary published in The Lancet Psychiatry, have flagged as urgent.
Separately, and often conflated with this issue in public discourse, Pakistan's colonial-era Penal Code still criminalizes same-sex sexual activity under Section 377, a law inherited from British rule in 1860, carrying penalties up to life imprisonment. It's worth being precise here: Section 377 concerns sexual conduct and sexual orientation, while the Transgender Persons Act concerns gender identity recognition — two legally and conceptually distinct issues that are frequently, and inaccurately, merged in public debate.
A Critical Look: Where the Debate Genuinely Gets Contested
It would be intellectually dishonest to present this as a simple story of an enlightened rights movement versus blanket rejection. The debate, both globally and within Pakistan, has legitimate contested dimensions worth naming directly:
The religious and legal critique. Scholars and clerics who supported the Federal Shariat Court's ruling argue their objection isn't to the existence of intersex or gender-nonconforming people — which the court explicitly accommodated — but specifically to a legal standard based on unverifiable "innermost feeling" with no medical or objective criteria attached. They argue this creates a genuine loophole: without a verifiable standard, the law could theoretically be invoked to alter inheritance shares (which in Islamic law differ by sex) or to legitimize relationships that would otherwise be classified as same-sex under existing criminal law. Whether or not one agrees with this reasoning, it is a substantive legal argument, not merely blanket prejudice, and it partly explains why some khwaja sira elders themselves have expressed ambivalence about a purely self-identification-based legal framework being imposed over their community's own longstanding, more communally-verified systems of recognition.
The conflation problem. Several academic reviews — including ones sympathetic to transgender rights — note that Pakistani law and public discourse tend to lump together intersex conditions, khwaja sira cultural identity, and the modern clinical category of "transgender" as though they were one uniform group. Critics on multiple sides argue this conflation weakens both legal precision and cultural authenticity, making the law easier to attack in court and harder to defend consistently.
The global medical controversy. Pakistan's debate doesn't exist in isolation. Internationally, the clinical approach to gender dysphoria — particularly regarding hormonal and surgical intervention, and especially in minors — has become genuinely contested within medicine itself in recent years. Reviews such as the UK's Cass Review raised concerns about the quality of evidence behind some gender-affirming medical protocols for youth, and a number of European health systems have since scaled back or restricted certain interventions pending further evidence. This is a live, evolving scientific and clinical debate, not a settled consensus in either direction — and it's a relevant backdrop to why some Pakistani physicians and clerics remain cautious about adopting Western clinical frameworks wholesale.
The rights-based critique of the rollback. On the other side, human rights organizations and mental health bodies argue the Shariat Court ruling and surrounding rhetoric — using terms like "disorder" and "illegal sexual act" to describe transgender identity — actively worsens the mental health and safety of an already vulnerable population, regardless of the legal reasoning behind it. The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan and international bodies have specifically warned that stripping legal recognition doesn't resolve the underlying social reality of gender-diverse Pakistanis; it simply removes their legal protection while they continue to exist within society.
Both critiques can be true simultaneously: a law can have genuine drafting and definitional problems worth scrutinizing, while a ruling that strips protections can also carry real, documented harm for a marginalized population already facing high rates of violence and exclusion. Reasonable, knowledgeable people in Pakistan currently disagree on how to weigh these against each other, and that disagreement is playing out at the Supreme Court level as this piece is being written.
Why This Matters for Mental Health Care
Regardless of where the legal and religious debate ultimately lands, the psychological reality is not contested: people experiencing gender dysphoria, and khwaja sira or transgender individuals navigating family rejection, violence, or social exclusion, experience genuine and often severe psychological distress — anxiety, depression, and elevated suicide risk are well documented in this population globally and in Pakistan specifically.
Mental health professionals don't need to resolve the legal or theological debate to do their job well. What's needed, clinically, is a confidential, non-judgmental space where a person can be heard, assessed properly, and supported — whether that support involves helping someone cope with family conflict, process trauma from discrimination, manage co-occurring anxiety or depression, or simply have one conversation where they aren't required to defend their existence before being heard.
A Closing Note
This is not a topic with a tidy, universally agreeable conclusion — not in Pakistan, and not globally. What can be said with confidence is this: the people at the center of this debate are real, they are living through genuine hardship documented across multiple independent academic studies, and the legal, religious, and medical questions surrounding their situation remain legitimately unresolved and actively being litigated, debated, and researched. Any honest treatment of this topic has to hold both of those realities at once.
This article is intended for general informational and educational purposes. It does not represent a legal, religious, or medical ruling, and it is not a substitute for professional counselling, legal advice, or religious guidance.
Select Sources
- - DSM-5-TR / American Psychiatric Association — Gender Dysphoria diagnostic criteria
- - StatPearls (NIH/NCBI) — Gender Dysphoria overview
- - Medscape/Emedicine — Gender Dysphoria: Etiology
- - The Lancet Psychiatry (2023) — "Transgender rights in Pakistan: implications of Federal Shariat Court ruling"
- - Oxford Human Rights Hub — "Balancing Gender Rights: Pakistan's Federal Shariat Court's Verdict on Self-Perceived Gender Identity"
- - Human Dignity Trust — Pakistan Country Profile (Section 377)
- - International Journal of Psychology (2025) — "'We Are Raising Our Voices': Coping Strategies Used by Khwaja Sira in Swat, Pakistan"
- - Sociology Compass (2025) — "Gender Diversity and the Law in Pakistan"
- - NCBI/PMC — "Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Gender Dysphoria and Comorbid Depression in a Young, Low-Income, Pakistani Transgender Man"
Need support?
Book a confidential session, in person in Islamabad or online from anywhere in Pakistan.
The Social Reality: What Khwaja Sira and Transgender Pakistanis Actually Face
Whatever position one takes on the legal and religious debate, the documented, on-the-ground social challenges are stark and well-researched: